The first step in securing the efficiency of your location-based feature is to find the geolocation technology to fit your purpose. Receiving a discount coupon ten minutes later after passing your store or unsuccessfully trying to locate your new shop following a poorly mapped route, your customer is likely to get annoyed and start questioning your competence. What is more, the wrong technology choice can lead to mistargeted ad impressions. In their 2019 State of Location Advertising report, Location Sciences analyzed 500 million location-based mobile ad impressions delivered in the UK and US in 2019 and found out that companies wasted up to 65% of their advertising budget.
GPS is the most mainstream geolocation system that leverages the data from the satellite network to track device position in time with a decent 5-meter accuracy. Brands tend to rely on GPS to set up a virtual perimeter, or a geofence, around their brick-and-mortar stores that trigger an action when app users get in its range. Apart from this, the technology will be a great option for store location, delivery tracking, and route mapping.
GPS is, however, notoriously inefficient indoors. In most cases, satellite signals are not powerful enough to pass through walls and roofs, which leads to low service reliability and poor location tracking accuracy.
Thus, in case you aim your location-based services for exclusively in-store use, iBeacons will prove a more viable alternative. Small devices powered by the Bluetooth Low Energy technology, they can detect a customer’s mobile phone location precisely down to centimeters. Relying on iBeacon app development, brands can offer customers location-specific promotions as they pass a certain product section or show the detailed route to a particular department.
Another way for brands to target proximity ads is through a mobile device IP address. Denoting simply the place where a device connects to the internet, IP geolocation is less granular than GPS, detecting user position with a precision of several kilometers. This makes IPs unsuitable for hyperlocal targeting, but still applicable for campaigns aimed at broad areas like city districts. On the upside, IP geolocation is not susceptible to location spoofing, unlike GPS signals that, as Location Sciences reported, happen to be fraudulent in 36% of the cases, wasting a sizable chunk of brands’ advertising budget.