As the GPU-based machine learning revolution has gained pace over the last five years, popular headlines have concentrated on the ways in which AI automation might replace human effort in a number of sectors.
The targeted industries or occupations tend to be either mathematical and formulaic by nature, or else in some way repetitive and potentially quantifiable — and therefore susceptible to analysis and reproduction by machine learning systems.
On the face of it, the precise and exacting structures of the architect's trade are prime candidates for automation through AI software development, promising a transformative impact similar to the new CAD applications of the 1980s and 1990s. Yet an oft-cited study1 by The Economist places architects among the least-threatened professional group facing the onslaught of AI, with a mere 1.8% chance of being replaced by machine learning algorithms.
In this article we'll take a look at some of the concrete and abstract reasons why the architectural process is unlikely to be entirely supplanted by AI; but also at some of the ways in which machine learning is beginning to offer new tools, processes and analytical techniques to aid the architecture and construction sectors.
We'll see later that the outer layers of the architectural process represent a difficult target for the AI revolution, for political and economic reasons. In terms of the core mathematical processes, however, machine learning has a freer reign to provide useful new tools for development.